Field guide / 05 of 07

Causality.
Make the field legible.

Causality asks how an outcome may have been produced. A pattern can prompt the question; it cannot answer it on its own.

Representation before judgement plate from the Symbiain Field Manual
Orientation plate / Field ManualRepresentation before judgement

A pattern invites a mechanism question; it is not itself the answer.

The illustrated lesson

See the move.
Then make it.

Four web plates translate the Field Manual into a usable sequence: structure, application, record and practice. Read them in order, or return to the plate that your decision needs.

05A / Field plateCausality: the anatomy

What mechanism could explain this?

Causality: a Symbiain explanatory plateA diagram explaining the causality stage of the Symbiain method.01 / OBSERVED OUTCOMEPattern prompts the question3 LATEARRIVALSsix-week frame02 / COMPETING MECHANISMSSeveral accounts remain liveM1SUPPLIER CAPACITYM2ROUTE DISRUPTIONM3INSPECTION QUEUE03 / DISCRIMINATING CHECKWhat would separate them?COMPARErelease timeroute eventsqueue timePATTERN ≠ MECHANISM · EXPLANATION REMAINS PROVISIONAL
In plain languageMove from “these things occurred together” to competing accounts of how the outcome may have been produced.Why it mattersThis reduces premature closure and directs effort toward evidence that can distinguish between explanations.Method outputMechanism test
05B / Field plateA field in motion

Follow one bounded example through the method.

Running case / critical-component delivery

Three delays are established. Their cause is not.

  1. 01
    Signal

    Arrival variance increased during the six-week reference period.

  2. 02
    Alternatives

    Supplier capacity, carrier disruption, inspection backlog or poor master data could each produce delay.

  3. 03
    Discriminate

    Release timestamps, route events and inspection queue time would separate these mechanisms.

  4. 04
    Calibrate

    Confidence remains provisional until the relevant records are compared.

What Symbiain adds

The next investigation is chosen for its power to distinguish explanations, not for its fit with the preferred story.

05C / Field plateMake the reasoning inspectable

A useful method leaves a record that another person can question.

Produced record

Mechanism test

Competing explanations, their assumptions, discriminating evidence and current confidence.

Provisional
Revisable
01Source

Where did the information come from?

02Status

Observed, reported, inferred or unknown?

03Boundary

To what time, place and scale does it apply?

04Revision

What evidence would alter the account?

Boundary / not a licence to overclaim

Correlation is not a mechanism. An observed effect does not prove an intended chain.

05D / Field platePractise causality

A bounded 15 minutes field exercise.

01

Write the observed outcome without causal language.

02

Propose at least three plausible mechanisms.

03

State what each mechanism predicts you should find.

04

Choose the lowest-cost check that best separates them.

Completion test

You are finished when the evidence could genuinely weaken your favoured explanation as well as support it.

The reading frame

What to look for
before you decide.

What mechanism could explain this?

  1. 01Signal — an observed mark
  2. 02Indicator — a selected proxy
  3. 03Construct — an organising interpretation
  4. 04Reality — what exceeds the representation
  5. 05Mechanism — a plausible producing process

In practice

Three useful
moves.

This reduces premature closure and directs effort toward evidence that can distinguish between explanations.

01

State the observed signal

02

Offer competing mechanisms

03

Seek evidence that can discriminate between them

Calibration notes

Correlation is not a mechanism

An observed effect does not prove an intended chain

Continue to 06 / TensionsTensions →